On Tuesday, May 8th, at 3:00 pm the Boulder County Commissioners will be meeting to hear an update from Xcel Energy about the utility’s plans for the cessation of coal activities at the Valmont Power Station in east Boulder County.
Of particular concern for Boulder County residents is the fate of the coal ash produced by the Valmont plant and the serious threats that ash poses to water quality and public health in the region.
This meeting is open to the public but there will not be a public comment period at the meeting. If you want to submit a comment to the Commissioners or a question you would like them to ask Xcel on May 8th, we encourage you to submit your question or comment to the Commissioners before the deadline on April 30th.
Clean Energy Action will be hosting Nancy LaPlaca, a coal ash expert and a veteran of the fight against coal in Colorado, for an informational session to discuss the issues at George Reynolds Library the night before the meeting. For more information on the state of Colorado’s coal ash and the risks it poses to the public, check out Clean Water Fund’s full report and join us as we confront the legacy of coal-burning in Boulder County!
In late February 2018, Xcel and Denver signed a Memorandum of Understanding, or “MOU” that was touted as a way for Denver to work towards its goal of a 100% renewable energy. Clean Energy Action took a close look at the MOU and found that the substance did not match the hype. A summary of that analysis is below and the full analysis is attached.
A key goal of the analysis is to help Denver advocates recognize the limits of the MOU so as to better advocate for a cleaner energy future and for advocates in other communities to begin to better understand what is happening when their City representatives are talking about signing an MOU with Xcel.
Summary of the Analysis of the Xcel-Denver MOU
The Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Denver and Xcel (Public Service Company of Colorado or PSCo) executed in late February 2018 is primarily a document of lofty statement, but is non-binding and contains no commitments from Xcel to reduce the carbon intensity of their electricity and move to a high level of renewable energy. Rather, the MOU could easily serve to distract the City of Denver and its residents from efforts to decarbonize their electricity and even could be used by Xcel to entice the City of Denver into supporting Xcel’s proposals at the Colorado Public Utilities Commission that are very likely not what most Denver residents and businesses would support if they understood them.
Dear Renewable Energy Advocates–We have an AMAZING opportunity to move clean energy forward in Colorado–but we need your help to “get it right.” Please come to a training below and then to the PUC hearing on Feb 1, 2018. (Docket 16A-0396E “Stipulation” hearing)
Here are the key dates so far:
Monday January 22, 2018–6 pm, Boulder Training
Meadows Public Library,
Boulder, Colorado (4800 Baseline, behind the Safeway)
The February 1, 2018 PUC hearing is a critical opportunity for the public to help shape the PUC’s response to the need to retire Xcel’s coal plants long before their expected retirement dates.
This hearing will be about moving the retirement of the Comanche 1 and 2 coal plants in Pueblo up about 10 years into the 2020s. This is, of course, a step in the right direction, but we need your help to make the PUC understand the following:
Move Faster on Coal Retirements: We are in a crisis on climate change. We can and must move faster by retiring these coal plants even earlier and working to retire the rest of Xcel’s coal fleet much sooner also.
Don’t Rush to Build More Natural Gas: Replacing coal plants with wind, solar, storage and demand side options makes good economic and environmental sense. This is not true for building new natural gas capacity which will likely just become stranded in its own time.
Don’t Make Xcel’s Customers Pay for All of Xcel’s Poorly Considered Expenditures on Coal: Xcel has poured hundreds of millions of dollars into their old coal plants in Colorado in this century–including into Comanche 1 and 2. Now Xcel wants us to pay for all of this–and pay them their return (think “profit,” at their Weighted Average Cost of Capital or WACC) on the ill-considered coal plant expenditures they have made in recent years. This isn’t a just or equitable solution for ratepayers. If we are to set a fair and equitable precedent for how we dig ourselves out of the very deep hole we’ve dug on coal in Colorado, it will be up to the informed citizens who testify on February 1, 2018 at the PUC to get it done!
Just come to a training and we’ll walk you through
the key parts and make sure your statement is on-point and powerful! In case you haven’t noticed, climate change impacts are already getting really serious. Please help us move Xcel further, faster on the clean energy path–and when we move Xcel, we move all of Colorado utilities and the entire US utility industry.
After years of pressure from a coalition of groups including Clean Energy Action, the Obama administration initiated two critical reforms to the nation’s coal program, placing a moratorium on new federal coal leases and increasing scrutiny over Wyoming’s “self-bonding” policy.
A review of the 32-year-old federal coal leasing program is long overdue as lack of reform has failed to address climate change and has cost taxpayers billions of dollars.
While state and federal regulators ignored repeated warnings to take a hard look at “self-bonding” policies, the formerly second and third largest U.S. coal companies have gone bankrupt, potentially leaving hundreds of millions in mine reclamation costs to taxpayers.
Geologic facts underlie coal companies’ increasing production costs and financial insolvency, underscoring both supply concerns and the opportunity to take advantage of cleaner and more cost-effective sources of renewable energy.
Coal Reforms from the Rockies
How long does it take for a message to get from the Rocky Mountains to the halls of power in D.C.? In mid-January, after years of pressure from a broad coalition of environmentalists and landowner advocacy groups, the Obama administration took two critical steps to reform the nation’s coal leasing and mine reclamation policies.
Decision makers in D.C. may seem a far cry from Colorado yet these two decisions trace their origins to our state. Colorado groups including Clean Energy Action helped to initiate both reform campaigns, repeatedly warning state and federal regulators that, in addition to the devastating effects of climate change, the fiscal costs of inaction could rise to hundreds of millions – if not billions – of dollars.
In both reform efforts, Clean Energy Action played a catalytic role. In 2007, Clean Energy Action began to draw the attention of allied groups to legal frameworks for keeping carbon in the ground by opposing new federal coal leases. As early as 2012, Clean Energy Action began urging state and federal regulators to scrutinize “self-bonding” programs that allow coal companies, including some now in bankruptcy, to ensure reclamation obligations by passing financial stress tests.
Review of Reagan-Era Coal Leasing
On January 15th, the Obama administration announced a moratorium on new leases of coal mined from public lands. The Department of the Interior will begin a sweeping review of federal coal leasing, modernizing a program that hasn’t been updated in over 30 years.
In 1984, when the last review concluded, few understood the threat of global warming. Now, in 2016, it is clear that burning coal has a significant impact on climate change and federal coal, in the words of Interior Secretary Jewell, “contributes roughly 10% of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions.”
On January 22nd, prompted by a citizen’s complaint filed by the Powder River Basin Resource Council and the Western Organization of Resource Councils, the Department of the Interior gave the state of Wyoming 10 days (plus a short extension) to certify that the state’s mine clean up program satisfied federal reclamation laws. These laws require mining companies to provide adequate financial assurances that they will be sufficiently solvent to return mines to a usable or natural condition once mining at a site has ceased.
Wyoming’s “self-bonding” program has allowed coal companies to ensure future mining clean up costs on the strength of their balance sheets alone. This has become a risky proposition as the nation’s formerly second and third largest coal companies, Arch Coal and Alpha Natural Resources, have filed for bankruptcy. Their insolvency threatens to leave mines, including one larger than the City of San Francisco, scarring the Wyoming prairie.
In order for companies to continue mining operations, Wyoming’s self-bonding program requires companies to demonstrate a “history of financial solvency” that appears to be at odds with Arch and Alpha’s Chapter 11 bankruptcies. Disturbingly, the nation’s largest coal producer, Peabody Energy, also faces potential bankruptcy, having lost 99% of its market value since 2011.
The Full Cost of Coal
While the administration’s actions to address coal leasing and self-bonding are laudable, it is hard not to imagine how different things could have been had this administration or previous administrations addressed these issues. According to a 2012 study from the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis that called for a moratorium on new coal leases, 22 of 26 coal sales since 1991 had only a single company bidding on publicly-owned coal. As a result of lack of competition, taxpayers lost out on billions of dollars in tax revenue.
The full cost of coal must reflect public health impacts from air pollution that damages the brains of our children, and the hearts and lungs of our families, as well as the disturbance of our lives and livelihoods from increased natural disasters and a changing climate. Placing a price on federal coal that promises a “fair return to taxpayers” must include a strong accounting of coal’s external impacts.
Who’s left on the hook?
The collapse of faulty self-bonding programs represents further potential losses for the public. States’ failures to heed repeated warnings may leave taxpayers on the hook for the unpaid reclamation liabilities of bankrupt coal companies.
In Wyoming, the state has struck a deal with bankrupt Alpha Natural to allow the company to continue mining while securing only $61 million of Alpha’s $411 million in reclamation obligations. The math isn’t pretty – that’s less than 15 cents on the dollar.
In Colorado, $100 million of future reclamation work is self-bonded. The state has given assurances that it is “moving away from self-bonding” but has not yet offered details on how quickly.
Coal & Renewables: Very Different Prospects
As coal’s role in society is re-evaluated, state and federal regulators would do well to heed warnings that they have thus far been quick to write off. In particular, regulators need to understand that beyond the threat coal poses to our health and environment, intractable geologic facts underlie the insolvency of our largest coal producers.
When any substance is mined, the easiest deposits are extracted first. Succeeding layers are more and more difficult to access, with more and more rock and soil to remove. Because of this inexorable logic, Powder River Basin coal productivity declined 25% between 2002 and 2013. From 2002 to the end of 2015, Powder River Basin coal prices have risen 72%. Consequently, increasingly expensive coal is increasingly unable to compete with renewables and natural gas.
The coal industry’s unprecedented rate of insolvency should concern the regulators who oversee fuel resource planning decisions, customer rates and reliability. Coal still provides 30% of the nation’s power and nearly double that in Colorado. Yet the prospects for mining coal profitably appear terribly bleak.
In contrast, wind and solar are more cost-effective than ever. Recently renewed federal tax credits for wind and solar offer an opportunity to phase out coal power and replace it with more cost-effective sources of energy that do not contribute to air pollution and climate change. Combined with the falling cost of energy storage, a renewable-powered grid becomes a viable possibility. Let’s hope that this time the message gets through more quickly.
Accelerating the transition from fossil fuels to a clean energy economy