Tag Archives: Colorado


​Dear Renewable Energy Advocates–We have an AMAZING opportunity to move clean energy forward in Colorado–but we need your help to “get it right.” ​​Please come to a training below and then to the PUC hearing on Feb 1, 2018. (Docket 16A-0396E “Stipulation” hearing) 

Here are the key dates so far: ​​

Monday January 22, 2018–6 pm,  ​Boulder ​Training

Meadows Public Library,
Boulder​, Colorado​
 (4800 Baseline, behind the Safeway)
Thursday January 25, 2018–6 pm, Denver Training
​Epic Brewing​
3001 Walnut St. Denver, CO 80205 Phone: 720-539-7410 ​
Monday January 29, 2018–​6 pm Lakewood/Jeffco Training
Belmar Library
555 S. Allison Parkway, Lakewood, Colorado
Thursday Feb 1, 2018–4​-7​ pm
PUC Public Hearing 16A-0396E

Coal plant retirements, payment plans & replacement options1560 Broadway, #250,Denver 

The February 1, 2018 PUC hearing ​is a critical 
opportunity for the public to help shape the PUC’s response to the need to retire Xcel’s coal plants long before their expected retirement dates. 
This hearing will be about moving the retirement of ​the ​Comanche 1 and 2 ​coal plants in Pueblo ​up about 10 years ​into the ​
2020s. This is, of course, a step in the right direction, but we need your help to make the PUC understand the following:
  • ​Move Faster on Coal Retirements: ​ We are in a crisis on climate change. We can and must move faster by retiring these coal plants ​even ​earlier and working to retire ​the rest of Xcel’s coal fleet much ​sooner also.
  • ​Don’t Rush to Build More Natural Gas: ​Replacing coal plants with wind, solar, storage and demand side options makes good economic and environmental sense. This is not true for building new natural gas capacity which will likely just become stranded in its own time.
  • ​Don’t Make Xcel’s Customers Pay for All of Xcel’s Poorly Considered Expenditures on Coal: Xcel has poured hundreds of millions of dollars into their old coal plants in ​Colorado in this century–including into Comanche 1 and 2. Now Xcel wants us to pay for all of this–and pay them their return​ (think “profit,” at their​ Weighted Average Cost of Capital or WACC) on the ill-considered ​coal plant ​expenditures they have made in recent years. This isn’t a just or equitable solution for ratepayers. If we are to set a ​fair and equitable ​precedent for how we dig ourselves out of the very deep ​hole ​we’ve dug on coal in Colorado, it will be up to the ​informed ​citizens who testify on February 1, 2018 at the PUC to get it done!
​Just come to a training and we’ll walk you through 
​the key parts and make sure your statement is on-point and powerful! ​In case you haven’t noticed, climate change impacts are already getting really serious. Please help us move Xcel further, faster on the clean energy path–and when we move Xcel, we move all of Colorado utilities and the entire US utility industry. 
But….We can’t do it without YOU!

Coal Leasing and Self-Bonding Warnings Finally Heeded

Brief Overview:

  • After years of pressure from a coalition of groups including Clean Energy Action, the Obama administration initiated two critical reforms to the nation’s coal program, placing a moratorium on new federal coal leases and increasing scrutiny over Wyoming’s “self-bonding” policy.
  • A review of the 32-year-old federal coal leasing program is long overdue as lack of reform has failed to address climate change and has cost taxpayers billions of dollars.
  • While state and federal regulators ignored repeated warnings to take a hard look at “self-bonding” policies, the formerly second and third largest U.S. coal companies have gone bankrupt, potentially leaving hundreds of millions in mine reclamation costs to taxpayers.
  • Geologic facts underlie coal companies’ increasing production costs and financial insolvency, underscoring both supply concerns and the opportunity to take advantage of cleaner and more cost-effective sources of renewable energy.

Coal Reforms from the Rockies

How long does it take for a message to get from the Rocky Mountains to the halls of power in D.C.? In mid-January, after years of pressure from a broad coalition of environmentalists and landowner advocacy groups, the Obama administration took two critical steps to reform the nation’s coal leasing and mine reclamation policies.

Decision makers in D.C. may seem a far cry from Colorado yet these two decisions trace their origins to our state. Colorado groups including Clean Energy Action helped to initiate both reform campaigns, repeatedly warning state and federal regulators that, in addition to the devastating effects of climate change, the fiscal costs of inaction could rise to hundreds of millions – if not billions – of dollars.

In both reform efforts, Clean Energy Action played a catalytic role. In 2007, Clean Energy Action began to draw the attention of allied groups to legal frameworks for keeping carbon in the ground by opposing new federal coal leases. As early as 2012, Clean Energy Action began urging state and federal regulators to scrutinize “self-bonding” programs that allow coal companies, including some now in bankruptcy, to ensure reclamation obligations by passing financial stress tests.

Review of Reagan-Era Coal Leasing

On January 15th, the Obama administration announced a moratorium on new leases of coal mined from public lands. The Department of the Interior will begin a sweeping review of federal coal leasing, modernizing a program that hasn’t been updated in over 30 years.

In 1984, when the last review concluded, few understood the threat of global warming. Now, in 2016, it is clear that burning coal has a significant impact on climate change and federal coal, in the words of Interior Secretary Jewell, “contributes roughly 10% of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions.”

In 1984, coal companies had yet to begin driving the process, in the words of CU coal expert Mark Squillace, deciding “whether, where, and how much coal they want to lease.” In particular, more than three quarters of federal coal sales had only one bidder.

Bankruptcies and “Self-Bonding”

On January 22nd, prompted by a citizen’s complaint filed by the Powder River Basin Resource Council and the Western Organization of Resource Councils, the Department of the Interior gave the state of Wyoming 10 days (plus a short extension) to certify that the state’s mine clean up program satisfied federal reclamation laws. These laws require mining companies to provide adequate financial assurances that they will be sufficiently solvent to return mines to a usable or natural condition once mining at a site has ceased.

Wyoming’s “self-bonding” program has allowed coal companies to ensure future mining clean up costs on the strength of their balance sheets alone. This has become a risky proposition as the nation’s formerly second and third largest coal companies, Arch Coal and Alpha Natural Resources, have filed for bankruptcy. Their insolvency threatens to leave mines, including one larger than the City of San Francisco, scarring the Wyoming prairie.

Coal Leasing and Self-Bonding Warnings Finally Heeded - Arch Coal's Black Thunder Mine is unimaginably big - about the size of San Francisco
At over 47 square miles, Arch Coal’s Black Thunder Mine is slightly larger than the City of San Francisco.

In order for companies to continue mining operations, Wyoming’s self-bonding program requires companies to demonstrate a “history of financial solvency” that appears to be at odds with Arch and Alpha’s Chapter 11 bankruptcies. Disturbingly, the nation’s largest coal producer, Peabody Energy, also faces potential bankruptcy, having lost 99% of its market value since 2011.

The Full Cost of Coal

While the administration’s actions to address coal leasing and self-bonding are laudable, it is hard not to imagine how different things could have been had this administration or previous administrations addressed these issues. According to a 2012 study from the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis that called for a moratorium on new coal leases, 22 of 26 coal sales since 1991 had only a single company bidding on publicly-owned coal. As a result of lack of competition, taxpayers lost out on billions of dollars in tax revenue.

The administration’s programmatic review of coal leasing promises to “provide a fair return to taxpayers” and to “account for the environmental and public health impacts” of the federal coal program.

The full cost of coal must reflect public health impacts from air pollution that damages the brains of our children, and the hearts and lungs of our families, as well as the disturbance of our lives and livelihoods from increased natural disasters and a changing climate. Placing a price on federal coal that promises a “fair return to taxpayers” must include a strong accounting of coal’s external impacts.

Who’s left on the hook?

The collapse of faulty self-bonding programs represents further potential losses for the public. States’ failures to heed repeated warnings may leave taxpayers on the hook for the unpaid reclamation liabilities of bankrupt coal companies.

In Wyoming, the state has struck a deal with bankrupt Alpha Natural to allow the company to continue mining while securing only $61 million of Alpha’s $411 million in reclamation obligations. The math isn’t pretty – that’s less than 15 cents on the dollar.

In Colorado, $100 million of future reclamation work is self-bonded. The state has given assurances that it is “moving away from self-bonding” but has not yet offered details on how quickly.

Coal & Renewables: Very Different Prospects

As coal’s role in society is re-evaluated, state and federal regulators would do well to heed warnings that they have thus far been quick to write off. In particular, regulators need to understand that beyond the threat coal poses to our health and environment, intractable geologic facts underlie the insolvency of our largest coal producers.

When any substance is mined, the easiest deposits are extracted first. Succeeding layers are more and more difficult to access, with more and more rock and soil to remove. Because of this inexorable logic, Powder River Basin coal productivity declined 25% between 2002 and 2013. From 2002 to the end of 2015, Powder River Basin coal prices have risen 72%. Consequently, increasingly expensive coal is increasingly unable to compete with renewables and natural gas.

Coal Leasing and Self-Bonding Warnings Finally Heeded - Powder River Basin labor productivity 2002 to 2013

Coal Leasing and Self-Bonding Warnings Finally Heeded - Powder River Basin average price of coal 2013
Powder River Basin coal has increased in cost 72% from 2002 through the end of 2015. 2014 and 2015 data were not yet available in the Energy Information Agency’s coal data browser.




The coal industry’s unprecedented rate of insolvency should concern the regulators who oversee fuel resource planning decisions, customer rates and reliability. Coal still provides 30% of the nation’s power and nearly double that in Colorado. Yet the prospects for mining coal profitably appear terribly bleak.

In contrast, wind and solar are more cost-effective than ever. Recently renewed federal tax credits for wind and solar offer an opportunity to phase out coal power and replace it with more cost-effective sources of energy that do not contribute to air pollution and climate change. Combined with the falling cost of energy storage, a renewable-powered grid becomes a viable possibility. Let’s hope that this time the message gets through more quickly.

Protect Colorado’s Forests from New Coal Mining

Tell the Forest Service not to give Arch Coal, a company that today filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy,  access to 19,000 acres of pristine, roadless National Forest for new coal mining.

Devastating Numbers

  • New mines would give the nation’s second largest coal company access to 170 million tons of publicly-owned coal
  • Coal would release 485 million tons of carbon pollution into the atmosphere along with millions of cubic feet of methane emissions
  • The Forest Service’s own analysis estimates $13 billion in environmental and economic damages


Dear Decision Makers:

First, thank you for your public service. However, I want to let you know that I strongly object to further investments in coal fired electricity, as Xcel Energy is currently attempting to do in Colorado!

Energy markets are undergoing tremendous change with the US coal industry nearing collapse while renewable energy prices continue to plummet. Above all, time is running out for us to address climate change.

Colorado needs to prepare for a bright future, not double down on the dirty energy of days gone by.

Xcel Energy’s plan to spend $400 million upgrading two coal plants, Pawnee and Hayden, is unacceptable. As the coal industry continues its decline those upgraded coal plants will become STRANDED ASSETS to be paid off with MY money and YOURS. These investments are chasing sunk costs, throwing good money after bad, when we should be working to move beyond coal as quickly as possible.

Energy efficiency, clean renewable power and electricity storage consume no fuel or water, are already cost-competitive, and should be favored by the PUC whenever the opportunity arises. The coal fired generation on Xcel's system cannot easily be used to balance with renewables on the grid, so further investment in coal impedes the integration of more renewable energy into our grid.

Again, we need to plan for the future, not pretend we're in the past. Please cancel Xcel's plans to upgrade Pawnee and Hayden.

Thank you for your consideration.


234 signatures

You may not receive confirmation but your signature will be added when you click "Sign Now". Share this with your friends:


Keep Our Forests Untouched

Explore the area around Paonia, and you’ll find some of the Western Slope’s most beautiful country. That’s why in 2012, the area was included in 4.2 million acres of National Forest that were set aside under the Colorado Roadless Rule.

The Roadless Rule was intended to conserve Colorado’s forest for future generations but a Forest Service proposal threatens to give Arch Coal access to thousands of acres of roadless National Forest for new mines.

Keep Coal in the Ground

China recently announced a 3 year ban on new coal mining. The Obama administration should also halt new coal leases, but these new mines would give Arch Coal access to 170 million tons of publicly-owned coal. When burned, this coal would release 485 million tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere along with millions of cubic feet of methane emissions.

We have until January 15th to tell the Forest Service: keep our forests untouched and keep this coal in the ground! Act now to protect Colorado’s forests from new coal mining.

“Ultimately, if we’re gonna prevent large parts of this Earth from becoming not only inhospitable but uninhabitable in our lifetimes, we’re gonna have to keep some fossil fuels in the ground.” – President Obama, upon rejecting the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline

Paris Negotiations: How Does Colorado Fit In?

In this infographic, CEA takes a look at how Colorado’s actions (or inaction) to mitigate climate change fit into the global framework of a 2 degree Celsius limit on global average temperature rise. In the context of this goal at the heart of the Paris negotiations: how does Colorado fit in? Specifically, how do Colorado’s projected emissions from electricity fit in?

As the Paris conference of parties begin this week, there has been much discussion about the 2 degrees Celsius limit on global temperature increases at the center of international negotiations. Yet it is clear that the pledges made by nation state leading up to Paris will not be enough to keep global temperatures from rising less than 2 degrees above pre-industrial levels. Meanwhile, many scientists and citizen advocates, including the Colorado Coalition for a Livable Climate, have prudently argued that the 2 degree increase in global temperatures is “highly dangerous.” Even a 2 degree increase could lead to sea level rise of “at least several meters” in this century.

Still, the international target of 2 degrees is a focal point of negotiations and has come to function as a widely-referenced measuring stick by which to judge the climate action commitments of nations, states, cities, and localities. Indeed, it’s come to serve as the measuring stick for the entire international community. Let’s see how Colorado stacks up!

Click Below to Expand

This infographic breaks down Colorado's projected emissions versus the global goal of 2 degrees Celsius.